Some preliminary thoughts about GSP’s narrow decision victory:
- It was reasonably apparent that GSP won the 3rd and the 5th rounds and Hendricks won the 2nd and the 4th.
- Previous N.S.A.C. decisions have shown that you have to beat the champion soundly to dethrone them by decision (for example, Henderson-Edgar II).
- First impression bias (like that first takedown GSP scored at the beginning of the fight) can make powerful impressions on some people.
You have to try and win the fight/game/match/contest as clearly as possible.
I don’t think that Hendricks’ corner should have told him that he was up 2-0 after the first two rounds. I personally agreed with that scoring but I could see how the judges might have split the first two rounds. And they shouldn’t have treated the fifth round like they just had to survive; Hendricks should have been told that it was a tied fight and fought accordingly.
Like Ric Flair said, “To be the man, you have the beat the man” (clearly).